What's new

This is the Worst Car I've Ever Reviewed.

tesla 1

Member
The Fisker Ocean, despite its exciting promise as an all-electric SUV, has faced some criticism. Let's break down the key factors like size, range, battery, price, annual maintenance cost, and warranty to understand why it might have received negative feedback.
1. Size

The Fisker Ocean is positioned as a compact SUV, similar in size to the Tesla Model Y or the Audi Q4 e-tron. It has seating for five people, offering decent interior space and cargo room (approximately 566 liters in the trunk, expanding to 1,274 liters with the rear seats folded down). However, some have criticized the rear seat's legroom for taller passengers.

fisker ocean.jpg

2. Range and Battery

Battery Size: Fisker Ocean offers a long-range option with a 113 kWh battery pack.
Range: The Ocean promises up to 440 miles (707 km) of range on the European WLTP cycle. However, real-world tests and EPA ratings might deliver lower figures, possibly closer to 350-400 miles, which could be a disappointment for some expecting more consistent performance.

3. Price

The Fisker Ocean starts at a competitive price for the base model, the Ocean Sport, around $37,500 in the U.S. However, higher trims such as the Ultra and Extreme can go up to $68,000 or more, which puts it in competition with more established brands offering better reputations for reliability and quality.

4. Annual Maintenance Cost

Since Fisker is relatively new and their cars have limited long-term data, maintenance costs are somewhat unknown. However, the car being fully electric should reduce some regular maintenance items (e.g., oil changes, spark plugs, etc.). Still, electric vehicles (EVs) can have higher costs for battery replacements or specialized repairs, especially for new manufacturers.

5. Warranty

Fisker offers a competitive warranty:

Basic Warranty:
6 years / 60,000 miles
Battery Warranty: 10 years / 100,000 miles
Drivetrain Warranty: 10 years / 100,000 miles
While these terms are decent, Fisker's ability to handle warranty claims smoothly is yet to be proven on a large scale, which may cause hesitance for buyers concerned about after-sales service.

6. Key Criticisms and Potential Problems

Build Quality:
Some reviews point to inconsistent build quality, such as fit-and-finish issues with interior materials, gaps in body panels, and problems with tech features (e.g., laggy infotainment system).
Software Issues: Like many newer EV manufacturers, Fisker has had reports of software bugs affecting the driving experience, including issues with the touchscreen controls, range estimates, and driver-assistance features.
Charging Network and Availability: Fisker does not have its own dedicated charging infrastructure like Tesla. This could make long-distance travel more challenging, relying heavily on third-party chargers, which may not always be reliable.

Conclusion:

While the Fisker Ocean offers competitive range, price, and warranty terms, it has encountered criticism primarily due to its build quality, unrefined software, and potential long-term reliability concerns. These issues may be the reasons why some reviewers have deemed it the "worst car" they've reviewed, as expectations for EVs in this price range are often higher given the competition.
Youtube
 
Top