What's new

Review Skoda Enyaq vs Ford Explorer - Which Family EV Owners Actually Prefer?

Admin

Administrator
Staff member
When comparing the Škoda Enyaq iV and the Ford Explorer Electric as family electric vehicles (EVs), several factors come into play, including towing capacity, performance, maintenance costs, and more. Here's a detailed comparison to help you decide which might be the better fit for your needs.

Towing Capacity:

Škoda Enyaq iV:
The Enyaq iV offers a towing capacity of up to 1,200 kg, depending on the model and configuration.
Ford Explorer Electric: Specific towing capacities for the Explorer Electric are not readily available.

Performance:

Škoda Enyaq iV:

Battery Options: Available with 62 kWh and 82 kWh battery packs.
Horsepower: Ranges from 177 hp to 282 hp, depending on the variant.
Range: Up to 348 miles (approximately 560 km) on a full charge for the 82 kWh version.

Ford Explorer Electric:
Battery Options:
52 kWh and 77 kWh battery packs.
Horsepower: Approximately 204 hp for the 52 kWh version and up to 286 hp for the 77 kWh variant.
Range: Up to 374 miles (approximately 602 km) for the 77 kWh version.

skoda enyaq vs ford explorer electric.jpg

Dimensions:

Škoda Enyaq iV:

Length: 464.9 cm
Width: 187.9 cm
Height: 161.6 cm
Wheelbase: 276.5 cm
Ground Clearance: 18.6 cm

Ford Explorer Electric:
Length:
446.8 cm
Width: 187.1 cm
Height: 163 cm
Wheelbase: 276.7 cm
Ground Clearance: 19.3 cm

Interior and Comfort:

Škoda Enyaq iV:
Known for its spacious interior, high-quality materials, and advanced infotainment system.
Ford Explorer Electric: Features a modern interior with a large touchscreen interface and ample passenger space.

Maintenance and Ownership Costs:

Škoda Enyaq iV: Generally has competitive maintenance costs, with strong residual values contributing to lower depreciation.
Ford Explorer Electric: As a newer model, specific maintenance costs are not well-documented, but Ford aims to offer competitive ownership costs in the EV market.

Safety Features: Both vehicles come equipped with a suite of safety features, including multiple airbags, advanced driver-assistance systems, and robust build quality.

Pros and Cons:

Škoda Enyaq iV:

Pros:

Spacious and well-appointed interior.
Strong range, especially with the larger battery pack.
Competitive pricing and strong residual values.
Cons:
Towing capacity may be limited for heavier loads.

Ford Explorer Electric:

Pros:

Modern design with advanced infotainment features.
Impressive range with the larger battery option.
Spacious interior suitable for families.
Cons:
As a new model, long-term reliability and maintenance costs are less established.

Conclusion: Both the Škoda Enyaq iV and the Ford Explorer Electric offer compelling features for families seeking an electric SUV. The Enyaq iV is praised for its spacious interior and strong residual values, while the Explorer Electric boasts a modern design and impressive range. Your choice may ultimately depend on specific needs such as towing capacity, interior space, and brand preference.

For a visual comparison and more insights, you might find the following video helpful:

Youtube
 
Last edited:
Skoda Enyaq iV feels like a car that was designed by people who actually use cars every day with their family. What I really like about it is how calm and predictable it is in real life. The interior is genuinely spacious, especially in the back, so kids, child seats, dogs and luggage don’t turn every trip into a packing puzzle. The ride is comfortable, quiet and relaxed, which matters more than sporty acceleration when you’re doing longer journeys or daily commuting. The range is realistic, not just a marketing number, and charging fits naturally into normal routines. I also appreciate that the controls are straightforward and not everything is hidden behind menus, which makes everyday use less frustrating. On top of that, the Enyaq feels like a proven product, with known running costs and decent resale value, which gives peace of mind if you plan to keep the car for years. It doesn’t try to impress you every day, but it works reliably in the background, and that’s exactly why it’s easy to live with.

The Ford Explorer Electric, on the other hand, doesn’t appeal to me as much for a few practical reasons. It’s still very new, so there isn’t much real long-term experience yet, and that uncertainty matters when choosing a family car. The interior is very screen-focused and digital, which looks modern, but for me it feels a bit overcomplicated for daily use, especially when you just want to change basic settings quickly. Another concern is the lack of clearly established towing and long-term durability data, which makes it harder to trust if you need the car to do more than just commute. It’s not that the Explorer Electric is a bad car, but these unknowns and the more complex digital approach are the main reasons it doesn’t really win me over.
 
Top