What's new

SMALL SUV BATTLE! -- 2026 Honda HR-V vs. 2025 Mazda CX-30: Comparison

Admin

Administrator
Staff member

🏁 Performance & Engine​


  • 2026 Honda HR‑V: Powered by a 2.0-liter inline‑4 with 158 hp and 138 lb‑ft, paired to a CVT. Offers FWD standard, AWD optional. 0–60 mph in approx. 9.8–9.4 seconds depending on drivetrain. Real‑world feel can be underwhelming in some situations
  • 2025 Mazda CX‑30: Base 2.5 L engine produces 191 hp (or 186 hp engine variants), with an optional turbo version up to 250 hp. AWD standard, paired with a 6‑speed automatic. Turbo trim accelerates to 60 mph in just 5.8 seconds

Verdict: For spirited driving and acceleration, the CX‑30—especially the turbo variant—has the clear edge.

honda h-rv vs mazda cx-30.jpg

🚗 Handling & Driving Feel​


  • HR‑V: Smooth, composed ride with light steering; suspension is independent front and rear, providing stable handling. Narrow powerband and CVT detract from dynamic feel
  • CX‑30: Sharper, sport‑tuned ride thanks to AWD and firmer suspension. Steering is precise and feedback-rich. Comfortable yet responsive

📐 Interior & Cargo Space​


  • HR‑V: More spacious overall: 41.9″ front / 37.7″ rear legroom, 24.4 cu ft cargo (up to 55.1 cu ft folded). Cabin design is functional but more utilitarian
  • CX‑30: Slimmer cabin: 41.7″ front / 36.3″ rear legroom, 20.2 cu ft cargo (expandable to 45.2 cu ft). Premium materials, minimalist layout gives a luxury impression

🔌 Tech & Infotainment​


  • HR‑V: Comes with a standard 9″ touchscreen, wireless Apple CarPlay/Android Auto on all trims, wireless charging, and adaptive cruise. Higher trims add blind‑spot monitoring and sensors
  • CX‑30: Standard 8.8″ or optional 10.25″ display (turbo trims), Apple CarPlay/Android Auto (wired on most trims), available head‑up display, Bose premium audio (12-speaker), 360° camera, Traffic Jam Assist

🛡️ Fuel Economy & Safety​


  • HR‑V: EPA-rated at 26/32/28 mpg (FWD), 25/30/27 mpg (AWD). IIHS Top Safety Pick+, 5-star NHTSA rating. Safety suite includes Honda Sensing features as standard
  • CX‑30: Base engine returns 26/33/29 mpg, turbo trim around 22/30/25 mpg. Also has IIHS Top Safety Pick+ and five-star NHTSA rating. i‑Activsense includes advanced features like surround-view and traffic jam assist


🧾 Summary Comparison​

Feature2026 Honda HR‑V2025 Mazda CX‑30
Engine / Power2.0 L, 158 hp2.5 L, 191 hp (250 hp turbo option)
0–60 mph~9.4–9.8 sTurbo: ~5.8 s
DrivetrainFWD standard, AWD optionalAWD standard
Interior / CabinRoomier, practicalPremium feel, snugger
Cargo CapacityUp to 55.1 cu ftUp to 45.2 cu ft
Tech & Infotainment9″ screen, wireless CarPlay/Android AutoLarger screens, more tech options, Bose audio, HUD
Fuel Economy~26/32/28 mpg (FWD)~26/33/29 mpg base; ~22/30/25 mpg turbo
Safety Ratings & TechTop scores, Honda Sensing includedTop scores, i‑Activsense with extra features
Driving ExperienceComfortable, smooth but unexcitingSporty, engaging, agile
Pricing (MSRP)~$27,600 – $31,400~$26,400 – $38,400 depending on trim


🗣️ Insights from Drivers (Reddit Highlights)​


  • HR‑V criticized by some for being sluggish (“maybe the slowest vehicle I've ever been in”; 0‑60 around 9.4 s) and less engaging
  • CX‑30 often praised: “much more fun to drive,” better interior quality, though smaller rear space overall

✅ Final Advice​


  • Choose Honda HR‑V if you prioritize space, fuel economy, and a refined ride.
  • Choose Mazda CX‑30 if you value driving dynamics, premium design, technology-rich cabins, and optionally turbo‑charged performance.
 
Top