What's new

Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (North America): Charging, Efficiency, Pricing & Real-World Ownership Guide

Admin

Administrator
Staff member

Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (North America): Charging, Efficiency, Pricing & Real-World Ownership Guide


Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid vs Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV (North America) Charging, Efficienc...jpg

Plug-in hybrid SUVs continue to rise in popularity across North America as drivers look for vehicles that balance electric commuting with long-distance gasoline convenience. Two of the most common choices are the Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid and the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV.
While both offer AWD, strong tech packages and EV-only range, they target slightly different buyers.

This article compares charging times, real-world consumption, pricing, practicality and known issues, with up-to-date information for the U.S. and Canada.

1. Overview of Both Models (North American Versions)


Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid

  • Powertrain: 1.6L turbo + electric motor (261 hp combined)
  • Battery: 13.8 kWh
  • EV range (EPA): 33 miles
  • Drivetrain: Standard AWD
  • Official page: hyundaiusa.com

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

  • Powertrain: 2.4L engine + dual electric motors (248 hp combined, higher peak output in EV mode)
  • Battery: 20 kWh (North America spec)
  • EV range (EPA): 38 miles
  • Drivetrain: Super-All-Wheel-Control (S-AWC)
  • Official page: mitsubishicars.com

2. Charging Times: Home, Level 2 and Fast Charging

Tucson Plug-In Hybrid


The Tucson PHEV does not support DC fast charging in North America.

Charging times:

  • Level 1 (120V household): ~10–11 hours
  • Level 2 (240V, 7.2 kW onboard charger): ~2 hours
    Source: Hyundai USA charging specs
    hyundaiusa.com

Outlander PHEV


The Outlander PHEV is one of the very few PHEVs in North America with DC fast-charging capability (CHAdeMO).

Charging times:

  • Level 1: ~12–14 hours
  • Level 2 (3.3 kW onboard charger): ~6.5 hours
  • DC Fast Charge (up to 50 kW): 0–80% in ~38 minutes
    Source: Mitsubishi Motors USA
    mitsubishicars.com
Verdict:

  • Tucson charges much faster at home because the battery is smaller and the onboard charger is stronger.
  • Outlander is the only viable choice for public fast-charging on road trips.

3. Real-World Efficiency (EPA, U.S. & Canada)


Electric Range


According to EPA:

  • Tucson PHEV: 33 miles EV range
  • Outlander PHEV: 38 miles EV range

EPA sources:
fueleconomy.gov

Total Efficiency

  • Tucson PHEV: 80 MPGe combined (EPA)
  • Outlander PHEV: 64 MPGe combined (EPA)

The Tucson is more efficient, but the Outlander travels further on electricity, making it better for longer EV commutes.

Gas-Only Mode


When the battery is depleted, real-world consumption typically becomes:

  • Tucson PHEV: 33–35 mpg highway equivalent
  • Outlander PHEV: 26–28 mpg highway equivalent

Because the Outlander is heavier and uses a larger engine, it consumes more gasoline in hybrid mode.

4. Pricing and Value (U.S./Canada)


U.S. base prices (approx.):
  • Hyundai Tucson PHEV: from $39,000 USD
  • Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV: from $40,000 USD

Canadian pricing:
  • Tucson PHEV: from ~$47,500 CAD
  • Outlander PHEV: from ~$48,700 CAD

Manufacturer pricing pages:
Hyundai USA – hyundaiusa.com

Mitsubishi USA – mitsubishicars.com
Verdict:
Prices are surprisingly close in North America. The Tucson provides better MPGe and faster home charging, while the Outlander gives you more range, more interior space, and DC fast-charging.

5. Interior Space, Practicality & Cargo


Tucson PHEV Cargo Capacity

  • 31.9 cu ft behind 2nd row
  • 66.3 cu ft with rear seats folded

Outlander PHEV Cargo Capacity

  • 33.5 cu ft behind 2nd row
  • 64+ cu ft with seats folded
  • Optional third-row emergency seating (North America)

Conclusion:
Outlander wins for families needing a larger cabin or 3rd-row flexibility, while Tucson is slightly roomier with seats folded.

6. Common Issues Reported in North America


Hyundai Tucson PHEV

  • Occasional infotainment crashes (usually fixed by OTA or dealer software updates)
  • Some reports of 12V auxiliary battery drain
  • Rare charging communication errors with Level 2 chargers

Hyundai Technical Service Bulletins are available at:
nhtsa.gov

Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV

  • Early DC fast-charging ports may reduce charging speed if overheated
  • Some owners report firmness in suspension over rough roads
  • Occasional EV range degradation after several years (normal for PHEVs, but more noticeable due to larger battery)

NHTSA recall & service info:
nhtsa.gov

Reliability summary:
Both models perform well overall, but Hyundai suffers more from software quirks, while Mitsubishi owners sometimes note battery-related aging due to larger capacity and frequent DC charging.

7. Which One Should You Buy in North America?


Choose the Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid if you want:

  • The best MPGe efficiency
  • Faster Level 2 charging at home
  • A more modern cabin and smoother ride
  • Lower fuel consumption in hybrid mode
  • Lower long-term maintenance costs

Ideal for: urban commuters, suburban families, and home-charging users.

Choose the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV if you want:

  • DC Fast-Charging capability (rare in PHEVs)
  • Longer EV range (38 miles EPA)
  • More interior space and optional third row
  • Better off-road capability due to S-AWC

Ideal for: road-trippers, families needing space, and drivers who want maximum electric versatility.

8. Final Verdict (North American Market)


The Hyundai Tucson Plug-In Hybrid is the better choice for commuters who value efficiency, fast home charging and refined driving.
The Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is the superior option for drivers who want longer electric range and DC fast-charging capability features that make it unique among North American PHEVs.

For most buyers, the decision comes down to charging behavior and space needs. If you mostly charge at home and drive under 35 miles daily, choose the Tucson PHEV. If you want flexibility on long trips and bigger interior volume, the Outlander PHEV wins.
 
Good comparison overall, From a charging-infrastructure standpoint, this is the real-world takeaway:
  • Tucson PHEV is clearly optimized for home charging. The 7.2 kW onboard charger is excellent for a PHEV, and most owners will be fully charged in ~2 hours on a Level 2—ideal for daily commuting.
  • Outlander PHEV is unique because of DC fast charging, but CHAdeMO availability in North America is shrinking, and frequent DC use on a PHEV-sized battery can accelerate degradation.
  • For most homeowners, a 240V Level 2 charger makes more sense than relying on public DC for either vehicle.

    If you charge at home, Tucson PHEV is the smarter, simpler setup. If you truly need public fast charging and extra space, the Outlander PHEV has a niche advantage—but home charging still matters most.
 
Got it here’s a very short, direct reply that clearly responds to the previous text:


Exactly. In real-world use, home charging is the deciding factor.
The Tucson PHEV is clearly optimized for efficient Level 2 charging, while the Outlander’s DC fast-charging advantage is increasingly limited by CHAdeMO availability and long-term battery concerns. For most owners, a 240V home charger matters far more than public DC access.
 
Top